No sphere is contractible. Moreover, if then is not homotopy equivalent to .
As homotopy equivalent spaces have isomorphic homology, it will suffice to prove that and that when . This is clear from the above calculations. ∎
Suppose that with . Then is not homeomorphic to .
Note here that and are certainly homotopy equivalent, as they are both contractible. This is perfectly consistent: homeomorphism implies homotopy equivalence but not conversely.
Suppose that and that we have a homeomorphism . We must show that . If then is a single point so is a single point so . Similarly, if then . Thus, we can restrict attention to the case where .
Choose and put . It is easy to see that restricts to give a homeomorphism . We can now define maps
by
A tiny adaptation of Proposition 9.12 shows that and are homotopy inverses for and respectively, so that all maps in the above diagrams are homotopy equivalences, so and are homotopy equivalent. It follows by Theorem 16.1 that as required. ∎
Let be a continuous map (for some ). Then there is a point such that .
The proof will rely on the following construction.
Put . For we consider the map given by , so traces out the straight line joining to , with and .
It is geometrically clear that this line crosses the sphere at precisely two points, one with and the other with . We define to be the intersection point with .
The map is continuous, and it satisfies if .
It is possible to argue geometrically, but more efficient to just find the formula for the point . Put , so for some , and must satisfy . Expanding this out, we get
The quadratic formula tells us that the positive root is
Note that the quantity under the square root is nonnegative, because squares are always nonnegative and so . Also, the vector is nonzero by the definition of so so it is harmless to divide by . This shows that is a well-defined continuous function of the pair . It follows that the function is also continuous.
It is clear from the geometry that if (so lies on the unit sphere ) then . Alternatively, it is clear in this case that is a nonnegative root of our quadratic, so it must be the same as . ∎
Suppose, for a contradiction, that we have a continuous map with no fixed points. This means that for any we have so we can define . If , then this is just . This means that is a retract (and thus a homotopy retract) of . As is contractible, we can use Proposition 9.24 to see that is also contractible, but this contradicts Theorem 16.1. ∎
Let be a non-constant complex polynomial. Then has a complex root.
There are many different ways to prove this theorem. We will give a proof using homology.
Consider a non-constant polynomial of degree , so
for some coefficients with . Suppose, for a contradiction that is never zero. Choose some very large radius and define by . As we are assuming that is never zero, the division is valid and lies in as required. Put and . As is constant, the map is zero. As gives a homotopy between and , the map must also be zero. However, as is very large and , the term will be much larger than all the other terms in , so . Thus, if we put then will be very close to for all , so the straight line from to will never pass through , so will be linearly homotopic to , so . However, it is clear from our earlier discussions in Section 11 that and sends to , so we have a contradiction. ∎